Even if the industry stops targeting individuals, by targeting ISPs with lawsuits it means ISPs can shut off your internet service if they detect you engaging in illegal file sharing. Suing ISPs is an aggressive strategy, and it means it is still risky to use any P2P file sharing service where illegal file sharing might occur. Cox Cable) for permitting illegal file sharing. Now they are suing ISPs or Internet Service Providers (i.e. She has been forced to declare bankruptcy as a result.Īs recently as June 2017, the entertainment industry is still pursuing aggressive action against illegal file sharing, and this time they are taking it a step farther and moving beyond lawsuits against individuals. Thomas-Rasset refused to pay the fine, and her lawyers argued that such a massive fine was unconstitutional. She was sentenced to pay massive fines varying from $1.92 million to $222,000 in restitution. The lawsuit went through three trials and was against a Minnesota woman named Jammie Thomas-Rasset, who was found guilty of illegally sharing songs on Kazaa. Probably the most infamous case was the music industry's first lawsuit against a music fan that went to a jury trial. However, the biggest reason to avoid these services is simple: the music industry is still targeting people for illegal file sharing. The code is therefore at least functional and maybe virus-free. There are few active users (a few thousand), but there are people sharing files. The original creators of Kazaa have yet to pursue any lawsuit against Kazaa Lite and despite the virus risks, these unauthorized versions do have active users.
Kazaa Lite (And Other Kazaa Imitations) Users Are Still Lawsuit Targets for the Entertainment IndustryĪdmittedly, the first two reasons might come across as over-cautious.
0 kommentar(er)
